The Marketing Grant provides support for marketing and publicity to improve visibility and generate sales.
The Assessment Criteria was approved on April 1, 2026 for the 2026-27 Fiscal Year. Any amendments made after the fact will be posted here:
Applications must meet all Phase One criteria to be deemed complete and move on to the assessment panel for review. These criteria are assessed internally by Creative Saskatchewan staff.
A complete budget, using the Creative Saskatchewan budget template, has been uploaded to the application. Budget templates are updated annually, and applicants are encouraged to double check that they are using the most up to date template.
A completed project financing structure listing pending or confirmed funding sources for the remaining 50%+ of the project budget that Creative Saskatchewan does not support has been included in the application.
The majority of project expenses are eligible according to program guidelines. If ineligible expenses exceed 50% of the total project budget, the whole application will be deemed ineligible.
If travel is part of the project budget a complete travel itinerary, using the Creative Saskatchewan travel itinerary template, has been uploaded to the application.
Budget line support documentation should be provided for all line items $500 and over. If support documentation has not been provided for more than 50% of line items $500 or more, the application will be deemed ineligible.
Examples of budget line support documentation include:
Provide a detailed workplan describing how you and your team are going to execute the project. Make sure to include:
This needs to be more specific than a general marketing plan. Include details of how this project will allow you to grow your market and how you plan to reach them. The workplan should realistically inform the timeline and the budget.
This criterion is assessed by external reviewers based upon the rubric below:
| 0 Points | 1-5 Points | 6-10 Points | 11-15 Points | 16-20 Points |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| The project’s marketing strategy does not identify a target market or relate the product to a target market. The strategy for reaching a target market was not provided. | The project’s marketing strategy identifies a target market, however, the relevance of the product to that market is limited. The strategy for reaching the target market is underdeveloped and lacks feasibility. | The project’s marketing strategy identifies a target market and some relevance of the product to that market. The strategy for reaching the target market is somewhat developed and is somewhat feasible. | The project’s marketing strategy identifies a target market and the relevance of the product to that market. The strategy for reaching the target market is developed and feasible. | The project’s marketing strategy clearly identifies a target market and the strong relevance of the product to that market. The strategy for reaching the target market is comprehensive, and highly feasible. |
Describe the experience and skillsets of yourself, your company, and your team members (if applicable). Please include:
This criterion is assessed by external reviewers based upon the rubric below:
| 0 Points | 1-4 Points | 5-8 Points | 9-12 Points | 13-15 Points |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| The application does not provide evidence of the team’s qualifications, and the team’s alignment with the project’s needs is not demonstrated. | The application provides limited evidence of the team’s qualifications, and the alignment between the team and the project’s needs is unclear. | The application provides adequate evidence of the team’s qualifications, showing sufficient alignment between the team and the project’s needs. | The application provides strong evidence of the team’s qualifications, showing clear alignment between the team and the project’s needs. | The application provides excellent and comprehensive evidence of the team’s qualifications, showing exceptional alignment between the team and the project’s needs. |
What is your realistic return on investment? This may include some or all of the following:
This criterion is assessed by external reviewers based on the rubric below:
| 0 Points | 1-2 Points | 3-4 Points | 5-7 Points | 8-10 Points |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| The return(s) on investment outlined in the application are unclear, and evidence to support the projected return(s) has not been provided. Job creation(s) for Saskatchewan residents is not demonstrated. | The return(s) on investment outlined in the application are limited, with unclear evidence to support the projected returns. The projected job creation(s) for Saskatchewan residents is limited. | The return(s) on investment outlined in the application are somewhat realistic, with adequate evidence to support the projected returns. The projected job creation(s) for Saskatchewan residents is moderate. | The return(s) on investment outlined in the application are realistic, with clear evidence to support the projected returns. The projected job creation(s) for Saskatchewan residents is notable. | The return(s) on investment outlined in the application are highly realistic, with strong evidence to support the projected returns. The projected job creation(s) for Saskatchewan residents is significant. |
Four bonus points will be awarded if you or the majority of your company owners/band stakeholder members (music)/collective members identify as any of the following:
For companies, collectives, and music bands, a minimum 50% of the stakeholders must meet this criteria to receive the bonus points. By completing this table, you are declaring confidentially that you identify accurately as part of the communities and identities specified. This information is not shared with external assessors.
This criterion is assessed internally by Creative Saskatchewan.
© 2026 Creative Saskatchewan. All rights reserved.
SubscribeWebsite by OmniOnline.